A method for processing the unreliable expert judgments about parameters of probability distributions
نویسنده
چکیده
A method for combining two types of judgments about an object analyzed, which are elicited from experts, is considered in the paper. It is assumed that the probability distribution of a random variable is known, but its parameters may be determined by experts. The method is based on the use of the imprecise probability theory and allows us to take into account the quality of expert judgments, heterogeneity and imprecision of information supplied by experts. An approach for computing ”cautious“ expert beliefs under condition that the experts are unknown is studied. Numerical examples illustrate the proposed method.
منابع مشابه
An Imprecise Model of Combining Expert Judgments About Quantiles
Most models of aggregating expert judgments assume that there is some precise probability distribution characterizing the system behavior and expert information allows us to compute parameters of this distribution. However, judgments elicited from experts are usually imprecise and unreliable due to the limited precision of human assessments, and any assumption concerning a certain distribution ...
متن کاملDebiasing Expert Overconfidence: A Bayesian Calibration Model
In a decision and risk analysis, experts may provide subjective probability distributions that encode their beliefs about future uncertain events. For continuous variables, experts often provide these judgments in the form of quantiles of the distribution (e.g., 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles). Psychologists have shown, though, that such subjective distributions tend to be too narrow, represen...
متن کاملCombining experts' judgments: comparison of algorithmic methods using synthetic data.
Expert judgment (or expert elicitation) is a formal process for eliciting judgments from subject-matter experts about the value of a decision-relevant quantity. Judgments in the form of subjective probability distributions are obtained from several experts, raising the question how best to combine information from multiple experts. A number of algorithmic approaches have been proposed, of which...
متن کاملComparing the Shape Parameters of Two Weibull Distributions Using Records: A Generalized Inference
The Weibull distribution is a very applicable model for the lifetime data. For inference about two Weibull distributions using records, the shape parameters of the distributions are usually considered equal. However, there is not an appropriate method for comparing the shape parameters in the literature. Therefore, comparing the shape parameters of two Weibull distributions is very important. I...
متن کاملPsychological Mediators of the Effects of Opposing Expert Testimony on Juror Decisions
This study examined the effectiveness of the opposing expert safeguard against unreliable expert testimony and whether beliefs about experts as hired guns and general acceptance mediate the effect of opposing expert testimony on juror decisions. We found strong evidence that the presence, but not the content, of opposing expert testimony affected jurors’ trial judgments and that these effects w...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- European Journal of Operational Research
دوره 175 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006